Facts? Isn’t It Explainable?

Facts? Isn't It Explainable?
Spread the love

What is the fact?

Because “facts” symbolize objectivity, and “value” implies subjectivity, the relationship between value and facts is crucial in the development of any theory of value and value judgments of objectivity.

Although descriptive sciences such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and comparative religion try to describe actual values ​​in fact and explain the similarities and differences between values ​​causally, the task of the philosopher is still to ask your goal.

 Philosophers want to know whether something is valuable because it is desired, as subjectivists like Perry argue, or because it is valuable, as objectively as Moore and Nicholas Hartman As the activists claim. In these two methods, a value judgment is assumed to have a cognitive state, and the difference between these methods is only whether a value exists as an attribute of something independent of human interest or desire for it.

 On the other hand, non-cognitivist deny the cognitive state of value judgments, thinking that their main function is emotion, just as the positivist A.J. as the analyst R.M. Rabbit embraced. Existentialists like Jean-Paul Sartre who emphasize freedom, decision, and value choice also seem to reject any logical or ontological connection between value and fact.

What is fact-checking and why is it important?

The Oxford Dictionary describes fact-checking as a process aimed at “investigating (problems) to verify facts.” However, despite its enlightenment, this inevitably concise definition is limited in its understanding of the actual results that constitute a fact check, the changes and scope of its practice, social, political, and cultural factors, and the background of the fact check. Has become a convention.

Facts? Isn't It Explainable?

It is important to go beyond recent narratives of “facts” and “fake news” and current political and social moments, and to emphasize fact-checking positions when considering human nature, interactions, and our interrelationships more broadly. In short, fact-checking is a form of critical investigation and investigation. It includes a wide range of methods and practices. But there is a story behind the fact-checking and contemporary needs for it.

The dissemination of misinformation is man-made in nature. Nobel laureate in economics, Daniel Kahneman (Daniel Kahneman) introduced the concept of “WYSIATI” (What You See Is What You Get), which means that we tend not to look for what we haven’t seen. We prefer to rely on information directly provided to us, rather than fully understand the information we don’t know. If we only see certain elements of the story, we will construct the best story from these partial elements. Part of the focus of fact-checking is to be aware of the cognitive biases that each of us is born with. Although these prejudices help us navigate our daily lives. They can also cause us to ignore relevant facts, even if they are presented.

The use of facts and narratives as tools for political mobilization has always been a long-term established means of persuading the consensus of the public group. The new, more modern images of Calais Bourgeois and Trotsky are examples of how to fabricate consent to use denial evidence and direct physical manipulation of evidence to tell stories that those in power insist on telling.

How do you distinguish between facts and opinions?

What is the fact? Facts are true statements that can be verified or proved objectively. In other words, the truth is true, and it is true anyway. Here are some examples of facts:

  • The sun is a star.
  • Humans are mammals.
  • An organism is composed of one or more cells.

Opinions are statements that reflect people’s views or thoughts on topics and topics. For example, your friend said that all kinds of ice cream are delicious. This is your opinion, because not everyone can think in the same way, nor can it be proven correct. Opinions may not conform to the facts or are not supported by solid evidence. But there are exceptions, such as expert opinions.

Facts? Isn't It Explainable?
Facts? Isn’t It Explainable?

Sometimes, the language used in opinions may be deliberately emotional to mislead others. Therefore, we need to know the purpose of the message or information. Is it to let you know or persuade you to do something or buy a product?

Distinguish Facts And Opinions

Here are some tips on how to distinguish between facts and opinions. First, ask yourself, “Can it be tested?” Supporting evidence can be easily found in the books in the reference section of the library. Or you can use reliable sources of information. Such as the websites of well-known educational institutions, to search online. These sources will provide evidence of the same facts. However, as for opinions, what is said may vary depending on the source of the information.

The facts will also be fair. They not only support a point of view but also provide objective information. In the case of opinions, the author’s writing may be biased. Plus, trying to convince the reader what he is saying.

I hope you now know more facts and opinions! When you conduct research, try to find facts rather than opinions, because they are supported by evidence.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *